Let’s simply let her supporters answer.
Here are some comments from angry Jill Stein supporters on the Friendly Atheist Facebook page in response to my article criticizing her statements on the U.S. vaccination program. It was gratifying to see these dwarfed by many thousands of likes and shares, as was a lovely mention as well by the national progressive humanist group Center for Inquiry’s Paul Fidalgo in his daily roundup of humanist news:
Speaking of Stein, Bo Gardiner does a good overview of Stein’s many pseudoscientific predilections.
But it’s a veritable online rule that people who disagree are the most likely to comment, and comment they did.
[A version of this article appeared on July 27 at The Friendly Atheist.]
By Bo Gardiner
In a 2013 speech, Jill Stein calls for the imprisonment of GMO producers based on discredited claims, ignores the environmental damage that would produce, and says the difference between the major parties is mere “window dressing” [Source: YouTube].
I’m a strong progressive with socialist leanings, but more than anything else, I’m an environmentalist working for biodiversity – it’s my life’s passion. I campaign hard for Greens running in local elections. While a government environmental scientist, I successfully blew the whistle more than once on politicized agencies’ illegal actions to permit corporate pollution. I pushed my agencies hard to put science over politics and stop dragging their feet on climate change. While working for a nonprofit conservation group, I managed successful statewide biodiversity campaigns, criticizing politicians and government agencies who were obstacles. In my personal life, I’m a naturalist and organic gardener, who lectures about gardening for wildlife.
For these reasons, I would not dream of voting for Jill Stein, and will be voting for Hillary Clinton for President. Does this surprise you? It shouldn’t if you’re looking deep enough.